God may have taken Charles, but his family held the door open. They inferred, without written evidence, that Charles wouldn't have wanted to go on living in this condition. "Daddy did not want to be a vegetable," said Vi Skogen, who at the time was Charles' daughter-in-law. Tom DeLay's mother told the Times, "There was no point to even really talking about it. There was no way [Charles] wanted to live like that. Tom knew—we all knew—his father wouldn't have wanted to live that way."
That was then. This is now. At a press conference on March 18, Tom DeLay denied that quality of life could be valid grounds for withdrawing Schiavo's feeding tube. "It's not for any one of us to decide what her quality of life should be," he said. "It's not any one of us to decide whether she should live or die."
Monday, March 28, 2005
Slate: The Lesson of Tom DeLay's Mortal Hypocrisy
Posted by AA at 17:54
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Tom Delay is just showing his true self,he shows no evidence of being a truthful person when it becomes necessary for his limelight.T.A.
Post a Comment